{"id":1538,"date":"2021-05-22T11:22:16","date_gmt":"2021-05-22T18:22:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/development.moviemaker.com\/?p=2465"},"modified":"2023-01-31T05:26:18","modified_gmt":"2023-01-31T13:26:18","slug":"the-peak-experiences-of-pip-karmel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.moviemaker.com\/the-peak-experiences-of-pip-karmel\/","title":{"rendered":"The Peak Experiences of Pip Karmel"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n
\n

\"Pip<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

Writer\/director Pip Karmel’s debut
\n feature, Me, Myself, I<\/i>, starring the delightful Rachel Griffiths,
\n established this Australian moviemaker as someone who can deliver
\n the goods. Solid direction, a good script: just what we’ve come
\n to expect from one of Australia’s small but impressive band of auteurs.
\n Though the Australian film industry is not a large one, there’s
\n certainly no lack of talent brewing down under. <\/span><\/p>\n

Like many of her mates, Pip
\n studied at Australia’s National Film School. Starting out as
\n an assistant editor, she went to film school in order to put
\n herself on the fast track to becoming a proper film editor.
\n It was there that she met director Scott Hicks, who invited
\n Pip to take some time off from school and cut his first feature, Sebastian and The Sparrow<\/i>. With that under her belt,
\n Pip returned to film school determined to become a director
\n herself, which she has accomplished. Along the way, she has
\n returned to the editing chair twice — both times for friend
\n Scott Hicks — to cut his break through picture Shine<\/i>,
\n and his most recent outing, Hearts In Atlantis<\/i>, starring
\n the resplendent Anthony Hopkins.<\/span><\/p>\n

MM:<\/b> Was <\/i>Hearts
\n In Atlantis unique in any way as an artistic challenge? And
\n how does it compare to a movie like Shine?<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

PK:<\/b> Shine was full
\n of music; it was a different animal with its own challenges. The reason I did Hearts In Atlantis<\/i> was that, a)
\n I like working with Scott [Hicks] and b) he offered
\n me the job at a point where the timing was perfect. I
\n hadn’t edited anything since Shine and I’ve been concentrating
\n on my directing career. I just had my first feature released.
\n At about the same time, I had my first baby. When Scott rang
\n me up the baby was about three months old. It was a great
\n opportunity to do something wonderful while my baby is still
\n small. I didn’t think I’d be able to direct anything at that
\n point, and it’s always a delight working with Scott. And the
\n film has Anthony Hopkins in it — so altogether it was a sort
\n of high-end experience. <\/span><\/p>\n

MM:<\/b> How do you prepare
\n as an editor? Do you read the script and make notes before
\n you begin?<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

PK:<\/b> I read the script
\n a couple of times. Scott usually makes fun of me because
\n I don‚t read the script too much (laughs). Once I’ve read
\n it, I just virtually put it away; I’m only working with the
\n material that’s being shot. Occasionally I might forget
\n what’s supposed to be happening, but if you can’t get the film
\n out of the material that ‘s being shot…<\/span><\/p>\n

MM:<\/b> …you’re in
\n trouble…<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

PK:<\/b> You’re in trouble! And the script — while I respect the script absolutely
\n — once the director has done the job of putting it on film,
\n I think you’ve got to work [with that]. The raw material
\n for an editor is the footage; even if something looks good on
\n paper sometimes it works differently on film.<\/span><\/p>\n

MM:<\/b> Are there ever
\n occasions where a scene has been shot and you request more footage? <\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

PK:<\/b> Yes, occasionally.
\n And very occasionally Scott would ask, if I was on-set,
\n for me to check something, and then tell me, jokingly, that
\n I’m responsible for it if it doesn’t work. (laughs) There
\n are always scenes where another shot or two might help, but
\n often you find that the longer you live with something,
\n you can make it work. By the time the crew has gone back
\n to do the pick up shots, you’ve made it work without them. It’s
\n amazing what you don’t need. <\/span><\/p>\n

MM:<\/b> Do you have
\n any conscious sense of working with the production design when
\n you cut? There’s always a lot of atmosphere in a Scott Hicks
\n film; in Shine, water is a main theme: a fish tank in
\n the foreground, rain, a water hose, the bath tub, the shower,
\n the swimming pool, water from a sprinkle splashed on a car windshield.
\n Do you consider any of that when you edit?<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

PK:<\/b> That’s been worked
\n out before it gets to me. If there is a scene like that
\n in the film, I guess you could cut it in a way that diminishes
\n it, but my main concern is the story; I don’t look at much else.<\/span><\/p>\n

MM:<\/b> In <\/i>Hearts
\n In Atlantis, how significantly might the narrative shift
\n if you took out a given shot, or put one back in?<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

PK:<\/b> Well, I think in
\n all films there are, not so much with a particular shot, but
\n scenes, that whether when left in or taken out can shift the
\n general direction of the film, depending on how plot-heavy it
\n is. In something like Shine<\/i> or Hearts In Atlantis<\/i>,
\n where the story’s told mostly in flashback, you’ve always got
\n the framing scenes at the beginning and the end. <\/span><\/p>\n

In Shine<\/i>, there was
\n a scene shot for the beginning that ultimately wasn’t used;
\n in Hearts In Atlantis <\/i>there was always that possibility
\n as well — that you might not want to use those first and last
\n scenes that wrap around the film.  But that’s the
\n point of editing.  There’s something about sitting
\n and watching something for an hour and a half; it’s an intangible
\n thing, but you get certain impressions that maybe on paper were
\n really clear and become more open to interpretation when they’re
\n on film; they are very different animals. The writer might be
\n perfectly happy with the script and think, oh, it works perfectly,
\n but then there are so many factors that come into play when
\n it comes to film that the effect can be completely different.  The way a scene is blocked out, the way the actors
\n interpret their roles, and then there’s always the things that
\n happen on the day you shoot, and time constraints when you’re
\n filming it. I guess that’s what makes it exciting.<\/span><\/p>\n

MM:<\/b> With Anthony
\n Hopkins, there seems to be so much that he can do without actually
\n speaking. He expresses so much with a gesture or a glance.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

PK:<\/b> Yes, it’s wonderful
\n to edit material with actors like that; there’s a lot going
\n on in their eyes. But when he opens his mouth it’s golden, as
\n well. It’s beautiful material to work with, and kind
\n of an honor to edit material with an actor of that caliber. <\/span><\/p>\n

MM:<\/b> Has working
\n as an editor affected your work as a screenwriter?<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

PK:<\/b> Oh, yes. I’m seeing
\n it in my head more clearly; I think I understand what you don’t
\n need to write — hopefully I do, anyway — and the kind of transitions
\n that you need to make in a film. It’s not like writing prose,
\n and there’s no point writing some things because you can’t see
\n them when you shoot them. Often a writer will write something
\n that you can’t shoot as a director.<\/span><\/p>\n

MM:<\/b> Internal thought
\n processes?<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

PK:<\/b> Yes. I get not
\n to write that kind of stuff (laughs). <\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Writer\/director Pip Karmel’s debut feature, Me, Myself, I, starring the delightful Rachel Griffiths, established this Australian moviemaker as someone who […]","protected":false},"author":1641,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"disable_comments":false,"tpd_featured_posts_arr":"","hide_featured_img_single_post":false,"msn_featured_video":[],"_msn_custom_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[89],"tags":[],"feeds":[],"class_list":["post-1538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles-editing"],"primary_category":{"term_id":89,"name":"Articles - Editing","slug":"articles-editing","taxonomy":"category","url":"https:\/\/www.moviemaker.com\/category\/archives\/moviemaking\/editing\/articles-editing\/"},"thumbnail":false,"fimg_url_thumb":false,"featured_img_medium":false,"author_name":"Tim Molloy","author_avatar":"https:\/\/www.moviemaker.com\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=100,height=100,fit=crop,quality=80,format=auto,onerror=redirect,metadata=none\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/IMG_1078.jpg","author_link":"https:\/\/www.moviemaker.com\/author\/tim-molloy\/","post_categories":["Articles - Editing"],"parsely":{"version":"1.1.0","meta":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","headline":"The Peak Experiences of Pip Karmel","url":"http:\/\/www.moviemaker.com\/the-peak-experiences-of-pip-karmel\/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/www.moviemaker.com\/the-peak-experiences-of-pip-karmel\/"},"thumbnailUrl":"","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":""},"articleSection":"Articles - Editing","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Tim Molloy"}],"creator":["Tim Molloy"],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"MovieMaker Magazine","logo":"https:\/\/www.moviemaker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/mm_site_logo-2.svg"},"keywords":[],"dateCreated":"2021-05-22T18:22:16Z","datePublished":"2021-05-22T18:22:16Z","dateModified":"2023-01-31T13:26:18Z"},"rendered":"